Download PDF of this section (155 KB)
In the biological sciences as elsewhere, the development and assessment of tertiary students' generic skills is receiving
considerable attention. This recognises: graduates' need for adaptable skills in order to respond to future change; the value
placed on generic skills by employers; and the need for learning to continue beyond university. Describing the requisite skills
of new employees, one employer of biological science graduates said:
Good verbal communication skills, not only in the subject area but in wider areas of interest that allow someone to interact well with non-specialists. It is always a bonus to have someone who writes well. An ability to work independently but always know at what stage there should be reporting of work or problems to the supervisor. In other words, I would not want someone who is just going to go off and do their own thing. [employer]
From our discussion with employers of science and technology graduates we know that they are looking for well-rounded people with good communication and interpersonal skills; people who can learn independently and have a desire to keep increasing their knowledge and abilities throughout life. They want people capable of both critical thought and creativity. [excerpt from UniServe Science resource]
Despite widespread agreement that generic skills are important, there is no absolute definition of these skills. Principally debate centres around just how generic 'generic skills' really are. Taken literally, a generic skill would be discipline-neutral. That is, the generic skills of science graduates and those of arts graduates would be indistinguishable. Yet this is unlikely to be the case for many of the skills that we consider 'generic'. Written communication is a good example. The style of writing that is valued in science is quite different to the 'creative voice' that characterises writing in many of the arts disciplines. For this reason, transferable is often preferred to generic - skills developed in one arena serve as a basis for further development and adaptation when transferred to another arena.
The generic skills typically associated with university education include high level skills in:
Many other skills and attributes could be added to this list, and often are. For example, to 'think and reason logically', to 'be open to new ideas and possibilities', and to 'be responsible and effective citizens' are some of the phrases that appear in university lists of generic skills.
One of the academic staff we interviewed described university education in biological science as three complementary levels of learning. The first, he argued, is irrespective of the discipline and develops a set of a skills that are recognisably 'generic'. Within this, he argues, is framed the learning of science as a process of enquiry, and then the particular ways of thinking that characterise biological science.
It's multi-dimensional. Clearly you're introducing students, at the highest level, to university study itself - that is, the nature of higher education... So what is different about higher education? ... hopefully after any first-year unit, whether it's my biology or anybody else's unit on campus, students will walk out with a different way of thinking that characterises higher education, with all of those attributes of higher education in terms of scepticism, and enquiry, and critical thinking ... all the rest of it. They're the generic attributes of higher education.
Next level down, one would hope that what [students] get out of the unit is the particular thinking in science itself as a form of enquiry. So you would hope that at the end of a course, people would come to an understanding about what's distinctive about science, about it demanding evidence, and it's a blend of logic and imagination, and so on. [Thirdly] you want to come out ... with some sense about what's special about biology as opposed to physics. What's characteristic about biology? [academic, describing biological science learning at university]
While generic skill development may characterise higher education generally, most of the learning takes place within a particular disciplinary context. For the majority of undergraduate students studying biological sciences in Australia, their studies involve courses in the life sciences complemented by some study in associated science disciplines. Extensive study in non-science subjects is not commonly part of degree structures in the biological sciences.
Some generic skills are taught directly, and assessed explicitly, within the biological sciences. This is not equally true for all the valued skills and attributes, however. For example, interpersonal skills are highly valued and clearly transferable to many contexts - yet these are difficult to teach and even more difficult to assess. Even more problematic is the assessment of graduate attributes associated with ethics and values. How, for example, do we assess students' respect for different cultures or sense of civic responsibility? Should we? Statements of graduate attributes are often aspirational and, as such, may lie beyond the realm of direct teaching and assessment.
Despite the complexities and associated challenges described above, the teaching and assessment of generic skills is an integral component of courses in the biological sciences.
Many learning and assessment tasks in the biological sciences are specifically designed to develop students' skills in critical
thinking and analysis. A few of the more typical examples are listed below.
Critical and logical thinking involve asking a series of questions, such as: what is the question being addressed? what are
the assumptions? what is the evidence?
It requires that students develop the confidence to question assumptions and to pose relevant questions.
[see also: Examinations; Research projects; Presentations; Tests and quizzes; Written assignments]
Oral presentations are clearly a task associated with the development and assessment of oral communication skills. While assessment criteria for oral presentations will often also cover content, aspects of oral communication usually feature heavily [Examples: Macaulay; May; Oldroyd] [see also: Presentations].
There are numerous, less visible ways in which students develop their oral communication skills through their course of study.
Few of these are directly assessed, however, with the possible exception of participation in small-group settings such as
tutorials [see also: Student participation and contributions].
The development of written communication skills rates highly among the learning outcomes in the biological sciences. In particular, priority is given to the ability to present logical, well-structured argument and to precision and clarity of expression [Examples: Cavanagh 1; Hargreaves 2; Mulder 3; Rogers 1; Taylor 1]. Colourful or highly 'creative' prose is not usually a feature of writing in the biological sciences.
One of the themes to emerge from our interviews with academic staff were concerns about the poor writing skills demonstrated
by some students, particularly in large and diverse classes. A basic level of skill with grammar, vocabulary and expression
is deemed a necessary starting point for further development of students' writing skills - yet many students
are struggling with these basics. We were told of a range of intitiatives developed in response, including the early identification
of students' particular needs [Examples: Cavanagh 1] and the provision of learning strategies and resources
to support all students [Examples: Gleeson; Miller 1; Quinnell 1; Taylor 1; Taylor 2] [see also: Written assignments].
The ability to work in a team is an important generic skill. Groupwork and, particulary, group projects are widely used to both develop and assess students' team work skills. The direct assessment of such skills often involves peer and self-assessment, and may include specific criteria associated with team work processes [Examples: Kleindorfer; Meyer].
[see also: Groupwork; Peer and self-assessment]